Abstract On the 21st, the US International Trade Commission announced the final result of the second ruling on China's PV double-counter case. It was determined that crystalline silicon photovoltaic products imported from China would cause substantial damage to the US industry, and the US will impose “double-reverse†tariffs accordingly. Multiple...
On the 21st, the US International Trade Commission announced the final result of the second ruling on China's PV dual-reverse case. It was determined that crystalline silicon photovoltaic products imported from China would cause substantial damage to the US industry, and the US would impose a “double-reverse†tariff accordingly. A number of US solar industry organizations expressed disappointment with the ruling, saying that this move means a retrogression in the US solar industry.
The International Trade Commission issued an announcement on the same day to announce the above final result. According to this, US Customs will impose “double-reverse†tariffs on related products in mainland China and impose anti-dumping duties on Taiwan-related products.
In response to a complaint from the US branch of the German photovoltaic giant Solar World, the US Department of Commerce launched a second “double-reverse†survey of crystalline silicon photovoltaic products exported to the United States and Taiwan in January last year. Compared with the first "double-reverse" survey, the scope of the second "double-reverse" investigation has been further expanded, from photovoltaic cells to photovoltaic modules, laminates, panels, etc., and the object has also been expanded from mainland China to include Taiwan, intended to block Continental PV companies overseas OEM and procurement to avoid tariffs.
The US Department of Commerce announced the anti-dumping and countervailing final ruling results for China's PV products in December last year. The dumping margins of Chinese manufacturers were 26.71% to 165.04%, the subsidy range was 27.64% to 49.79%, and the dumping margin of Taiwanese manufacturers was 11.45. % to 27.55%.
After the US Department of Commerce announced the affirmative final ruling, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said that the US ruling further aggravated the trade dispute between the two countries, which seriously damaged the trade and cooperation between the two industries. Chinese enterprises expressed strong dissatisfaction. China will consider exercising its rights and safeguarding its own interests within the framework of the WTO [microblogging] and the US judicial system.
The final ruling of the US International Trade Commission on the day further triggered the disappointment of the US solar industry. The US Solar Industry Association, which has thousands of solar energy company members, said that the decision of the International Trade Commission meant that the US solar industry was “regressive†and that the US branch of the complainant Solar World Company could hardly get any benefit.
Another industry body, the US Solar Energy Alliance, said that the move by the International Trade Commission would raise the price of solar energy in the United States and harm the interests of US companies. According to statistics, the decline in PV module prices in 2014 brought about 21.8% of employment growth in the US solar industry. The alliance continues to call on the US and China to resolve trade frictions through negotiations rather than setting trade barriers.
Galvanized Steel Fence
Galvanized Steel Fence
Steel fence is also known as steel picket fence,
ornamental steel fence. The panels are manufactured using the
highest-strength steel pickets and rails, and are available in a wide
range of sizes and styles.
Material: Galvanized steel Q195 or Q235
Finish: galvanized and powder coated
Main market: America, Canada, Australia, Europe, etc
Galvanized Steel Fence,Prefabricated Steel Fence,Galvanized Steel Fence Post,Galvanized Steel Pipe Fence
HeBei Bosen Metal Products Co.,Ltd , https://www.hbbosenfence.com