Interpretation of "Implementation Measures for Fire Safety Responsibility System": Increase Responsibility for Fire Accident Responsibility

October 29, 2017, the State Council issued a notice "the implementation of fire safety responsibility system Measures" (Guo Ban Fa [2017] No. 87) (hereinafter referred to as the "Rules").

The introduction of the "Measures" to meet the actual needs of the same time, but also on the existing fire-related laws and regulations of the "fuzzy zone" more specific provisions, and strive to effectively form a joint firefighting work to enhance the public safety level of society. Through the interpretation of the policies of the State Council, the introduction of the Measures means that the fire department will increase the accountability for fire accidents.

In November 10, 2017, the State Council policies routine briefing held by the State Council Information Office, Ministry of Public Security Fire Department former director Yu Jianhua at the briefing about the "measures" and answered reporters' questions on the "approach" to read: "Measures The four measures from the responsibility target assessment, the use of responsibility assessment results, the frontier responsibility investigation, and the increased accountability for fire accidents ensure that the fire safety responsibility is in place. At the same time, the responsibility of social units is divided into three levels: general units, key units, and high-risk units.

Four-way initiatives

The first is the evaluation of responsibility goals. At the level of the State Council, it sets the target responsibility, and insists on assessing the provincial government every year. At the same time, it requires the provincial and municipal governments to evaluate the target.

The second is to strengthen the application of the results of the responsibility assessment. After assessing the provincial government at the level of the State Council, the results must be reported to the central organization department and be included in the national credit information sharing platform. It should serve as a reference for credit evaluation, project approval, land use approval, financial support, and financial subsidies. .

The third is the frontier responsibility investigation. The "Measures" stipulates that local government departments at various levels fail to perform their duties, or fail to perform duties in fire approvals, construction of public fire protection facilities, rectification of major hidden dangers, development of fire fighting power, etc., and cannot be said to wait until after a fire has occurred, although it has not caused Serious consequences, but not to perform their duties, but also to pursue responsibility.

The fourth is to increase the accountability for fire accidents. Compared with the past, the “Measures” put forward any fires that have caused casualties, deaths of personnel, or social impacts. They require the government to organize investigation groups to conduct investigations and handle investigations according to accidents and specific circumstances. Personnel responsibility, this is not in the past. For serious fires, the State Council has stipulated that more than 10 fires are organized by the provincial people's government . More than 30 people are organized or commissioned by the State Council to conduct investigations. In the past, 10 or fewer people were killed , and it was usually the public security agencies that led the investigation.

The "approach" put forward, as long as the dead man fire a fire or social impact, more than three people, which is based on the standard fire for more than three people called large fire, more than three people is larger than 10 persons In the case of fires, municipal people's governments took the lead in organizing investigations; 1 or more and 3 or less people were led by county-level people's governments. According to the investigation results, make corresponding treatment.

In addition, the "Measures" also divides the responsibility of social units into three levels, and divides fire rescue into general units, key units and high-risk units.

For the general unit, it is relatively loose, and there are some provisions in it.

Secondly, the key units should be further based on the general units. For example, the responsible persons and managers of key fire safety units must undergo fire training, fire control rooms and basic technical and physical defense facilities must be provided, and fire protection should be conducted on a regular basis. Safety inspections, staff training, etc., where necessary conditions to establish micro-fire stations, the establishment of a platform for smart fire treasure, enhance the fire inspection patrol remote monitoring and management.

Third, the high-risk units must go a step further. The key units are places where fires can easily occur and units where people are relatively concentrated. The high-risk units are super high-rise buildings, high-rise public buildings, and super large-scale complexes. These cities are marked with these units, and the occurrence of problems has great impact and losses. The requirements for high-risk units are more stringent.

The information in this article comes from the Internet and was reorganized and edited by China Rescue Equipment Network.